There's always something new to read about the Faculty, whether it's a new discovery by one of our academics, an award won by one of our students, or an upcoming event.
Most press releases will specify media contacts, but if in doubt, please get in touch with our Media Relations Officer, Michael Addelman, at email@example.com or on +44 (0)161 275 2111.
£2m invested in tackling air pollution in Greater Manchester
(18 September 2019)
Air quality research in Manchester has received a significant boost with the announcement of funding from two programmes, totalling nearly £2m.
"We are containers, it’s only the insides of our bodies that are important..."
Haunting words from Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale that summarise how fertile women are dehumanised in the dystopic fictional nation of Gilead, enslaved and forced into pregnancy and birth through a process of ritualised rape.
A nightmarish reification of anti-choice rhetoric, this seminal feminist text has informed and mobilised pro-choice movements throughout the world. Protesters in Europe, the US and Latin America have donned the handmaids’ iconic costumes – blood-red robes and isolating white bonnets – to advocate access to abortion.
As readers devour The Testaments, the eagerly anticipated sequel to the original book, we are forced to ask why, in 2019, the tale of an authoritarian regime where women lack bodily autonomy resonates so acutely in the current political climate. As Atwood has remarked, momentum has shifted in recent decades and, with the election of Donald Trump, “Gilead moved a lot closer”.
More than 30 years since readers’ first visit to Gilead, discourses surrounding reproductive justice have become increasingly foreboding. Ireland’s first abortion law on New Year’s Day 2019 – following last year’s historic referendum – was momentous but an anomaly. Elsewhere, progress is being undone.
‘Heartbeat bills’ in the US
Aggressively anti-choice pieces of legislation passed during Trump’s presidency illustrate the disturbing accuracy of Atwood’s assessment. Alabama approved a near-total ban on abortion in May, with no exception for rape or incest.
In 2000 there were four US states said to have laws that were “hostile” or “very hostile” to abortion rights. There are now 21. Several are debating “heartbeat” bills, which would ban abortion after six weeks’ gestation, before many women know they are pregnant. Medics have condemned the use of the word “heartbeat” in these pieces of legislation for misleading people about how developed an embryo is at this stage of pregnancy.
Religious overreach in Europe
Anti-choice politics is also thriving in Europe, particularly in traditionally Catholic countries. Malta is currently the only country with an outright ban on abortion, even in cases of rape and incest.
Even in countries where abortion is currently legal, conscientious objection proves a significant obstacle to access – recent statistics in Italy, where abortion was legalised in 1978, show that almost 70% of doctors refuse to carry out terminations.
In 2015, a right-wing coalition government in Portugal withdrew state funding for terminations and introduced compulsory counselling, imposing restrictions on the 2007 abortion law that had been ratified by a national referendum.
A far-right government in Poland continues to push for an outright ban that would criminalise women and doctors who perform abortions and investigate women who have miscarriages. Attempts to pass such reforms in 2016 and 2018 provoked mass street protests. Even without these reforms, Poland still only permits abortions in cases of foetal abnormality, serious risk to life, rape or incest.
Countries typically considered safe havens for social freedoms also impede access to abortion care through a labyrinth of protocol and paradoxical legislation. In 2017, a gynaecologist in Germany was fined €6,000 for advertising abortion services on her website, which is prohibited by a Nazi-era law.
Mandatory waiting periods are a further barrier patients must navigate. Disregarding criticism from the World Health Organisation, which says waiting periods undermine “women as competent decision makers” and reproductive rights groups that condemn delays as medically unnecessary and potentially dangerous, German law requires a three-day period between initial consultation and access to abortion. Clinics in the Netherlands must enforce a five-day delay and offer alternatives to abortion.
Dystopia is already here
Barbaric laws in Latin America dehumanise, criminalise and torture women and girls. In El Salvador, Evelyn Hernández who suffered a stillbirth – impregnated after being repeatedly raped by a local gang – is currently facing a third trial for aggravated homicide, a sentence that carries a prison sentence of 30 years. In Chile – where abortion was legalised in cases of rape, foetal abnormality and serious risk to life in 2017 – Adriana Ávila Barraza was forced to endure a torturous 24-hour labour before delivering a dead, deformed foetus when medics refused to terminate the pregnancy.
After suffering a bitter blow last summer when a proposed abortion law failed to pass in the senate, pro-choice activists in Argentina – recognisable by their trademark green handkerchiefs – continue to push for reform. They have been galvanised by the horrific recent case of an 11-year-old forced to undergo a caesarean after she was repeatedly raped by her grandmother’s partner, brutalised by both social and legal patriarchal structures.
From barbarically misogynistic practices to legal loopholes that continue to inhibit reproductive justice, a world where the female body is subject to state control is not limited to Atwood’s writing. Rather than consider Gilead a fictional, hyperbolic extreme, this authoritarian, patriarchal regime should serve as a sobering reminder. Female bodily autonomy is conditional on a functioning democracy - fundamental rights that are both inherently interrelated and increasingly precarious.
Gene mutation discovery sheds light on organ failure affecting babies
(13 September 2019)
A group of scientists and clinicians from the UK, the Netherlands, Italy and the USA have worked together and made an important discovery that explains an often fatal organ defect that affects unborn babies and children.
Scientists discover new breakthrough in cancer hair loss treatment
(12 September 2019)
Scientists have determined a new way to protect the hair follicle from chemotherapy in an effort to prevent hair loss as a result of cancer treatments.
Pharmacy staff to get suicide awareness training for the first time
(10 September 2019)
Community pharmacy staff are to be offered training on suicide prevention, based on findings from a new study published today. As a result, a first of its kind training video has been developed and will also be available from today to mark World Suicide Prevention Day.
Review reveals impact of nutritional supplements on mental health
(10 September 2019)
We’ve all heard that ‘food is good for your mood’. Now, a new study into mental health and nutrient supplementation has taken a leap forward by establishing the gold standard for which nutrients are proven to assist in the management of a range of mental health disorders.
More than 170 organisations and news outlets from around the world have now signed up for Covering Climate Now.
Smartphones could transform patient care, finds study
(22 August 2019)
Remote monitoring using smartphone apps could transform the medical care of patients with long-term health conditions, according to new research led by University of Manchester scientists.
A new study by researchers at The University of Manchester suggests that the current statistical model used by GPs to predict a patient’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) could be producing misleading results.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT) has received a £4.4M investment as part of the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) latest commitment in the fight against antimicrobial (antibiotic) resistance (AMR).
Leading health experts across the North have today joined together to respond to the worsening health inequalities between the North and the rest of England - over half of the North now has a lower life expectancy than the worst area in the South.
Around one in 20 (6%) of patients are affected by preventable harm in medical care a new led by researchers at The University of Manchester has found.
A new report has found that people with mental illness have drastic physical health challenges which contribute towards a gap in life expectancy of around 20 years, and has recommended changes to health policy and treatment innovations to tackle what is regarded as a ‘human rights scandal’.
A major new health research programme, led by researchers from The University of Manchester, has been announced today (11 July 2019) to tackle Greater Manchester’s biggest health challenges, as part of a £135m national investment.
University of Manchester and University of North Texas scientists are the first to show that an embryonic living heart can be programmed to survive the effects of a low oxygen environment in later life.
Discrimination of minority groups is likely to be associated with an increased risk of psychosis, according to a systematic review by University of Manchester and Lancaster psychologists.
An Oldham based doctor, James Bluett, has developed a new blood test which could help local rheumatoid arthritis patients to better manage their illness by keeping to their medication regimes.
By Dr Patrick Burch is a GP in Manchester and National Institute for Health Research InPractice Fellow at the Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester. This article first appeared in Pulse Magazine
It has long been recognised that there are more patients registered with English general practice than appear on the census. The issue of ’ghost patients’ is not new. What is new is the suggestion that practices are deliberately claiming for ghost patients in order to drive up their income. The number of ‘ghost patients’ varies from area to area. Our team at the Universities of Manchester and York looked in detail at the factors associated with ghost patient numbers. Our study, published last year in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health , was a cross-sectional analysis of the national GP patient list and census-derived population estimates. We calculated levels of patient registration with English general practice, in relation to census derived data in order to work out the number of ‘over-registered’ or ‘ghost’ patients. We conducted this analysis at several different area levels (eg: region, CCG) and used statistical techniques to investigate the relationship between levels of registration and deprivation, urbanicty, ethnicity, age, sex and mean distance to practice.
Our analysis showed that levels of ghost patients did vary considerably throughout the country. However, we picked up on several significant factors associated with higher levels. The most significant driver was an increased proportion of non-white population. Other significant factors were increased levels of deprivation and higher proportions of female or elderly patients.
Patients who remain on a practice list but no longer live in the UK will account for some of the over-registration. There are an estimated 4.5 to 5.5 million Britons living abroad. Unless a person leaving the UK specifically informs their GP or hands in their NHS health card, they would not normally be removed from the GP register. I worked in Australia for a couple of years, but remained registered with a UK GP. Had an analysis of my GPs list taken place whilst I was away, I would have been a ghost patient. Nonwhite populations in the UK tend to be more transient and more likely to move abroad. They are also likely to have larger numbers of foreign residents who would not feature on the census but would be eligible for GP registration. It is also not unusual for practices to treat British ex-patriots temporarily returning home to use NHS GP services. We know that, despite nationwide over-registration, there are people, entitled to NHS care in the UK, who are not registered with a GP. If a group of male and female immigrants move to the UK for the first time, the men of the group may be less likely to register with a GP because of their lesser use of healthcare than the women. This hypothesised under-registration of men, on the background of widespread overregistration, could account for the increased likelihood of over-registration in populations with higher proportions of women. Elderly populations also consult more and this could explain why there are higher rates of over-registration in populations with larger percentages of patients aged 60 or over. In short, there are drivers for ‘ghost patients’. They are complex, not fully understood and have nothing to do with fraud.
Patients missing out on arthritis drugs, shows study
(17 June 2019)
A class of drugs which have been successfully treating patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis should be made available for moderate suffers too, University of Manchester scientists say.
Recession saw rise in male patient suicide
(13 June 2019)
Recession-related increases in suicide have previously been reported globally. New research has shown an equivalent rise in suicide by mental health patients, particularly men aged 45-54.
Scientists at The University of Manchester are developing a smart phone application connected to goggles which flash light at a special frequency to tune patients’ brains in a ground-breaking treatment for chronic pain.
One in four UK children between the ages of 0 and 16 have a mother with a mental illness, according to a team of University of Manchester researchers.
Using the internet, for social media, browsing information and entertainment may affect our brain’s structure, function and cognitive development according to an academic review by an international team of researchers.
Professor of British History at the University of Manchester’s School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Professor Hannah Barker has scooped the coveted Social History Society’s Book Prize for her literary contribution to the history of the Industrial Revolution.
‘Family and business during the Industrial Revolution’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017) was awarded the accolade in June 2019 by a judging panel who believed the book to be the best original work of historical research published in the preceding calendar year.
‘Family and business’ explores the often forgotten business and family lives of women and small tradespeople during this period in history, despite their being at the heart of the economic and social transformation that swept Britain in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
“I’m thrilled to be awarded this prize,” said Hannah. “’Family and business during the Industrial Revolution’ was a long time in the making and, like the family businesses which the book describes, involved the input and hard work of more than one person.”
She thanked the AHRC for the funding boost it gave the project, and her research team including Nathan Booth, Stephen Connolly, Katherine Davies, Marci Freedman, and Lucinda Matthews-Jones, and postdoctoral research associates Jane Hamlett and Mina Ishizu.
The judging panel of Professors Pamela Cox, Patricia Thane, Phillipp Schofield, and Naomi Tadmor commented that the book “revises accepted wisdom in various fields” and described it as “an excellent piece of social history”.
Image credit: Wellcome Trust, via Wikimedia Commons
Work led by Professor Vaskar Saha, a paediatrician from The University of Manchester, means that around 80% of children with the most common childhood cancer are now likely to survive following treatment at major centres across India, thanks to his revolutionary approach.
Self-harm in middle-aged men increased significantly following the 2008 financial crisis, according to a study led by researchers at The University of Manchester..
Manchester reinforced its place today as a leader in translating brilliant academic science into new products and services which will transform the future of medicine and maintenance of human health.
Erectile dysfunction drug could treat heart failure – new study PureRadiancePhoto/Shutterstock
In the 1990s, the US drug firm Pfizer was developing drugs to treat angina. During early trials of these drugs, male participants reported a striking side effect: they were getting erections. This discovery led to the development of drugs to treat erectile dysfunction. Our latest study shows that one of these erectile dysfunction drugs (Cialis) is very effective at treating a particular type of heart failure in sheep.
Heart failure is a devastating condition that occurs when the heart is too weak to pump blood around the body. People with heart failure often cannot complete basic tasks without becoming breathless and developing a cough. It is also a condition where survival is worse than for many of the common forms of cancer. The high rates of heart failure and the fact that survival is poor highlights the need for newer and more effective treatments for this condition.
In a normal healthy person, the heart pumps more blood around the body when we exercise. This increase in the work performed by the heart is brought about by the hormone adrenaline which makes the heart beat more quickly and pump more strongly. In heart failure, the heart no longer responds properly to adrenaline which means it cannot increase the amount of work it does or pump blood effectively when we exercise.
We discovered that tadalafil (the generic name for Cialis) was very good at stopping heart failure getting worse. It was also surprisingly effective at reversing some changes that had already occurred in the failing heart before the drug was given. In particular, the heart could again respond properly to adrenaline and contract harder. Also, tadalafil reversed changes that had occurred to the structure of the muscle cells in the heart during the development of heart failure.
The findings from this study, published in Nature, Scientific Reports, may also help explain why people who have been intermittently taking drugs to treat their erectile dysfunction seem to be less likely to have a heart attack or die following a heart attack. Our research adds to the small number of clinical studies that have been performed in patients with heart failure where the related drug sildenafil (Viagra) was reported to improve the patients’ ability to exercise, but the mechanisms behind these positive effects remained elusive.
Despite the encouraging results from our study and the fact that drugs to treat erectile dysfunction are now available without a prescription, we need to remain cautious. The RELAX trial, which reported results in 2013, showed no improvement in exercise capacity in patients receiving sildenafil.
The reason for these differences is probably because two types of heart failure were being investigated in these clinical trials with the positive trials studying patients with systolic heart failure and the neutral trials studying patients with diastolic heart failure. In systolic heart failure, the heart does not contract (pump) adequately whereas in diastolic heart failure the heart still contracts normally but relaxation between heartbeats is impaired.
Still, the experimental findings in our study using tadalafil and those clinical trials in patients with systolic heart failure offer new hope for an effective treatment for heart failure.
While the work in our study was done using sheep, the strong similarities between the sheep and human hearts in the way they work and respond to disease gives us confidence that these findings will be replicated in humans. Indeed, clinical trials using tadalafil in patients with heart failure are a next step in the process of adding tadalafil to our toolkit to treat patients with heart failure, and we hope to be able to begin these in the near future.
Sex drug effective as heart failure treatment
(1 May 2019)
A drug used to treat erectile dysfunction has been found by University of Manchester scientists to slow or even reverse the progression of heart failure in sheep.
Urine test could prevent cervical cancer
(29 April 2019)
Urine testing may be as effective as the smear test at preventing cervical cancer, according to new research by University of Manchester scientists.